If we think too much about our experiences we quickly end up in an existential isolation where we become obsessed with the idea that only we experienced this and no one else. Even when we share an experience with other people on detailed examination we see that what we experienced was different from what they experienced. Perhaps the account of us meeting our future wife differs between us and our wife, or a friend that was there remembers it differently. What happens is that an "official account" emerges that everyone holds on to and forgets their actual experience. This happens at all scales even up to National Myths about the past. The most glaring at the moment is that the US performed the largest and most complete genocide in human history to clear the land for colonisation. But the "official" history remembered is extraordinarily different from this.
In rejection of the falsity that emerges from "official" narratives we retreat into private experience that lived uniquely has authenticity. But that authenticity has the cost of being experienced by only us and so is accompanied by loneliness.
The fear of loneliness drives many back into the arms of inauthentic group experience and they prefer to think official narratives than see things for themselves.
This has another side too. Official History does not die, while our personal private experiences are bounded by death. The real bite of the loneliness that comes from authentic private experience is that it is limited by death. It dies with us. Many grab a pen in later life to record their "private" experiences so that they will not be lost.
So what do we do?
Well actually the flaw in the authentic experience is that we do not complete the job of turning inwards. And the flaw in the inauthentic experience is that we do not complete the job of turning outwards.
They actually end up in the same place.
Turning inwards is the easier to study cos we can do that in a closed room with the door locked.
So we turn in on our experience inside the closed room, really relishing the fact that only we are experiencing this room now. There is no one else here, this is 100% my experience. Owning the "desert island" is a fantastic feeling at first. All mine. But soon it starts to become a prison. Wow we think no one ever experiences what I experience. I am trapped inside this. If only I could share with someone. So we rush outside and look for someone to share it with. But its just plastering over, because no matter how much we pretend we are "with" someone its always just "me." Unless we have a car crash that kills us together either I will die first or my partner will and this brings home the isolation. You can see where the romantic idea of couple suicides comes from. Only if we die together can we really say that we shared the same life. But its all pasting over the fundamental cracks that we are different. How sad for couple suiciders to realise that their death is still separate from their partner even tho they tried so hard to time them to coincide. Hopefully not to late to turn around and realise it was a flawed idea!
So we are back in our private room seemingly trapped in our private world with no way out.
If we carry on down this path the next stop is Solipsism or Monads where we decide that the "separation" must have some real existence and we decide we really are separate. So we say that the whole universe that appears to be just for me really is just for me. I exist alone in a private universe and everyone else is just a figment of my imagination.
Okay enough! Why go through all this mental gymnastics? What are we actually trying to resolve here?
So the thing is that its not the experiences that are the problem here. It is the stubborn belief that these experiences are being held by "someone."
If for a second we imagine that experiences just happened by themselves like lightening and thunder shaking up the skies and there is no need for "someone" there then what is the problem in our locked room? Sure these are unique experiences, just like a particular flash of lightening has never happened before and will never happen again. But does lightening get all existential as it fades away? No it lights up and it "lights down" no big deal. Its not so strange any more to say that there is no Zeus or God throwing down thunder bolts from the skies. No one "behind" what is happening. Lightening happens by itself. So why is it so hard to say the same for our experiences? Sitting in the closed room the picture on the wall (if there is one) lights up as we look to it, and as we look away it disappears again. Just like lightening.
Ah we argue but the difference is "I" looked at the picture so that "I" could see it. If "I" close my eyes then no picture no more. So it is "me" choosing to look and "me" seeing. So its different from inanimate lightening. There is a Zeus behind this, it is me!
Really?
How do you know you looked at it? Little voice inside your head? Some secret intuition about what is going on inside your body. Even more secret in fact than the picture you are about to look at in your locked private room? Its like there is the private room, and then another even more private room inside your body or head deciding what to do. Perhaps there is an even more private Holy of Holies inside the private one inside your head so that you have secret knowledge not just of the fact you are about to turn to see the picture, but that you know you are deciding to turn to see it... how deep does this rabbit hole need to go?
Do we need a Russian doll inside everything so that we can know what is going on?
So without getting into an argument over this, we can see that it is at least possible that the world is flat rather than Russian Doll like.
Ah wow suddenly no problem with private room. Experiences just are what they are. No one inside, no one to be separate from outside. No desperate need to throw the door open and go running into the arms of a partner to prove that we are not separate from everyone else and alone.
So that is the inside story.
What of the other, the inauthentic outside story. So we abandon private experience and we become a slave to the establishment believing what we are told even when it disagrees with what we actually saw ourselves.
For Americans this is Hell! Altho worth remembering that Americans believe that they are like Russian dolls which is equally Hell (and Russian).
Well there is no private investigation to write out here. Its not a very Western Philosophical thing to do-- which after Descartes is obsessed with personal private room (with or without stove) accounts.
But suppose we do give ourselves up to the crowd like people at an ecstatic Bacchic festival. Can't great evil come from this group behaviour where no one is responsible?
Well we are challenging the whole Western Lutherian Protestant concept of Reality here. "Lutherian" because the break from the Catholic Roman Church was a rejection of the authority of other people in our relationship with God. For Protestants (unlike Catholics) you can worship God alone without the need for priests, popes or church.
But like above lets not get into an argument lets just consider hypothetically that really the whole world happened before Luther and personal responsibility. Somehow Mankind was made, and mankind lived in groups like animals do today and at some point (perhaps Genesis) Mankind became aware of their existence and their personal responsibility (ate from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) and modern mortality was created.
Yet even without modern morality somehow mankind got here. Whatever was at work before mankind did an absolutely fantastic job: it made mankind.
The greatest evil done by mankind so far was the Nazi holocaust (well by official Western Narrative) and yet the Sun still rises every day as though nothing happened. The lightening still flashes in the sky just as it did before.
Are humans really so powerful that they can do "evil?"