Its no secret that the West has been trying to subdue China for almost 200 years. And, if Opium Wars are anything to go by, will stop at nothing to do this.
Currently the method used to crash China is the argument that the people are "not free". This in fact is not true. People in China are less likely to spend time in gaol than even British, and far less than Americans whose government imprisoned more of its own people than any other government on Earth. The Chinese state does less to restrict freedom than most countries in fact.
We also know that the West is not really concerned about freedom given that it supports the worst dictatorship in the world in Saudi Arabia where it is illegal to even criticise the government, and such criticism will end you up in prison if not publicly beheaded. While the media was looking at who murdered Jamal Khashoggi they rather neglected to point out the elephant in the room that it is illegal in Saudi Arabia to even criticise the government and the death penalty is available for those who break this law. The West does not apparently care for freedom at all and happy turns a blind eye to the worst excesses of totalitarian dictatorships like Saudi Arabia.
We also know that the CIA and MI6 are experts in causing unrest in countries. This was famously demonstrated in the MI6 overthrow of the democratic system in Iran to reinstall the corrupt dictatorship of the Shah who in turn agreed to carry on allowing the West to exploit Iran and extract oil and wealth from the country.
The history of the West is very much the subduing of countries and the extraction of their wealth. And when people rise up the West will violently oppose this where possible or seek terms of independence through which they can maintain the best terms for exploitation. Most famously when Germany rose up against the West in the 1930s Churchill was prepared to begin a global war to suppress their freedom.
The key technique used in 1953 in Iran was the buying of hooligans to create violent unrest which western backed media then sold in the press as a popular uprising against the democratic government. Simply by staging protests and violence the West was able to fake the idea that there was a popular movement against the government. The West then violently stormed the central media building took over the media of the country and the rest was easy. When a militia, backed simply by the West, surrounded the compound of the democratic leader Mossadegh and started to attack it with tanks they sold it again as a popular uprising. And when the Shah walked back in, it was made out in the media to be a triumphant return of the true leader of Iran. When in actual fact a democratic vote had shown that Iranians were actually sick of being exploited by the West and their corrupt puppet leader Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. But Iranians were fooled into thinking the popular mood had moved against Mossadegh even though the whole thing was performance was staged by just a few hundred people paid by the West.
This is how dangerous the media is. Control of the media, and the ability to create unrest are all that is needed to fake the idea of popular movements.
And when we look at China this more than anything looks like CIA backed unrest.
It is more complex than just finding a few people who will agree to fake it for cash. The CIA sets up groups and organisation so that people think they are working for one thing when in fact they are working to bring down the establishment that the CIA wants to overthrow to replace with a US aligned regime. US choses anyone who is useful and it is rarely democracy, despite officially using Democracy as the excuse for most CIA activity. Saudi Arabia is the best example of this.
In the TV series Narcos, as blogged before, the DEA is moved into Colombia by the CIA to remove Pablo Escobar. To the DEA it looks like a noble thing to do. But actually the DEA is pointed at Escobar not because of the drugs. There are dozens of other drugs barons and when Escobar is removed they just take over and the drugs trade to US actually increases. The DEA were not there to do anything about drugs, they were there to remove Escobar because he was a popular leader who threatened to end US control of the region and upset the corrupt US backed leaders in Colombia. CIA goes to huge lengths in South America to stop socialist and communist uprisings in order to stop the people controlling their own countries and resources. So DEA is just used by the CIA for purposes other than what they think they are doing. And so it is across the world. I know someone who was invited into Ukraine to set up government infrastructure. Like DEA a noble thing. But really I suspect its at the request of the CIA who is using them to remove Russian influence in the region so the US can take over and corrupt the leadership.
And we do not know the details but those we are told are rioting in China are going to be a complex mix of people, but I suspect very few of them will not have seen US dollars in one way or another for what they do.
Now governments are in a difficult position. If they quite rightly suppress the illegal unrest (that is the job of governments to keep the peace) the West can use media footage of this as evidence that the government is oppressing its people. Obviously that is nonsense the government is just suppressing the illegal foreign backed unrest. But if the government does nothing to suppress the unrest then it will look weak and the people will ask why they are not suppressing this illegal activity. People like effective governments that stand up for rule of law and protect their interests. Having riots is not a good look. US regularly has riots over the huge number of people who die in detention (around 450 a year) but its interesting how the media down plays this. Iran has a max of 11 a year and news is following the riots there. CIA may even be fuelling the riots.
Now the West is claiming the issue in China is over democracy. But actually no one in the West or the East had any say in their government's COVID policy. There was no difference is the democracy in America, Britain or China and people took to the streets in all countries to complain about lockdowns.
What was different was the degree of lockdown. In America which has the least over a million people have died. That is a lot of people losing their life to a government policy. In fact it amounts to a Holocaust. China by contrast has shown considerably more respect for life and despite being 4 times the size of US only 5,233 people have died! This is actually a spectacular achievement and demonstrates extraordinary care for the people.
Now what has probably happened is people have seen pictures of the West out of lockdown but as is typical the sacrifice made has been hidden in the media. If China followed the US policy then 4.5 million people would be in coffins. Do the demonstrations in China realise they are demanding the early deaths of 4.5 million people! That is almost like asking for the gas chambers to be rebuilt in terms of the magnitude of death. Its a tricky thing indeed. But Western propaganda as usual is just spinning it into nonsense in order to play psyops.
Bottom line when you see riots and protests on TV don't necessarily believe what you see! CIA PSyops are extremely sophisticated and far reaching.
No comments:
Post a Comment