1st attempt to formulate SRH in 2002

From archive. 7 Nov 2002. The initial expression of SRH 2. Not read just adding to blog.

Start of a proof of God I just found in computer coding !

1.0 I was playing around with a map i.e. an array of "Key" => "Value" pairs [*see post script] and I thought it was a possible way to hold the pairs of comparisons in an Sql WHERE statement (as long as the keys do not duplicate).

1.1 WHERE name="Mike" AND surname="Smith" AND Title="Mrs"; can be stored as

1.2 array(name => "Mike", surname => "Smith", Title => "Mrs");

2.0 But what happens to the "=" information? I realise that each entry needs 3 pieces of information: The Key, the Value and the "relationship"...seen this pattern before many times I thought...got thinking I did...

3.0 If we have just 1 piece of information then it can be stored in one place, but its not really information.

4.0 If we separate something into 2 pieces of information, then we automatically and necessarily create a 3rd piece of information viz. the relationship. But the relationship does not just simply accompany the separation...its integral. To illustrated consider...

4.1 If for a database we separate someone into their "Name" and "John" then when we identity them we say that their Name = John or Name is John. (WHERE Name = "John")

4.2 Unless this identity can be made then Name and John lose their meaning.

4.3 If we were to separate someone into "Fip" and "Ooob" and then never be able to say when "Yitt" is "Ooob" it is meaningless.

4.3 Thus the "relationship" the third piece of information of a pair is integral and actually the first thing we need to establish before making the separation. Then once its clear how the relationship works, then we can go around giving everything a name, and filling up the database. This is Platonic science.

4.4 So for any pair of things, they can only be a pair because we can identity some relationship between them. This is what holds the whole universe together.

5.0 Now what is a relationship? What is "=". If "A = B" and we store it as "A","=","B" we may think they are the same thing. But then wouldn't there a relationship between "A" and "=", "B" and "=" call is "#" so we have to store "A # = # B" and so on ad infinitum, whole harddisk full just storing "A=B". No "=" is the relationship it is not a new thing!

5.1 Going back to 4.3. The relationship is the process we established that enables us to create A and B in the first place. So its "=" that came first which created "A" and "B". So we are not storing "=" we're just storing the result of applying "=" which is "A" and "B". 3 pieces of information and a subtle distinction.

6.0 So as we look around the world all the things we see and experience are created by the relationships process. Thus things are created by the process of spatial relationship e.g. "over there", temporal relationship e.g. "yesterday"etc etc.

6.1 But a chair is not just different from a table because it is spatially and temporarily related from it. How we relate to them is different, "functional relationship". And there's more. Put all these together and this is the process of essence, i.e. how things come to be what they are.

7.0 the proofs in here somewhere, but its more subtle than I thought it would be...

*ps: a simple array say 

names = array("Matthew", "Mark", "Luke", "John") is Indexed (0,1,2,3)

so it can be expressed like 

0=>"Matthew", 1=>"Mark", 2=>"Luke", 3=>"John"

so names[2] refers to "Luke".

More generally the Index is called a Key and this is a Map so

"Apostle1"=>"Matthew", "Apostle2"=>"Mark", "Apostle3"=>"Luke", "Best"=>"John"

means that names["Best"] refers to "John".