What is wrong with Homosexuality?

 Just repeating stuff already produced in this blog but summarised for an answer on youtube.

"

No one has ever had a problem with lesbianism, not sure even the Jewish Law mentions it. The problem in West has been with sodomy and that true for both homosexuals and heterosexuals so its not to do with gay. So think the whole issue is misunderstood here. The question is what is wrong, if anything, with sodomy? So we remind ourselves what the point of sex is. If in doubt think that every human who has ever lived including me and you is the result of sex between a woman and a man. Sex is profound and is how we make people. Marriage is the institution around making people. (Marriage primarily is a way for men to ensure that women bear their children, women always bear their own children regardless; conversely women need help raising their children so good to bind a male in by promising him fidelity). So the problem with Sodomy is that it is not sex, it is not productive and is not profound, it is something else. Its true that in Bonobo apes sodomy is used as a social bonding activity. Indeed we could use sodomy in public like this. But we don't. The problem is that sodomy and gay marriage is confused with productive sex, they are completely different, and this has led to a decay of their meaning. Today sex in post 60s West is used like a drug. A heroine addict once said to me, if you want a high then ignore sex and do heroine. Sex activates about half your endorphin receptors, heroines does the lot. For most people these days they should just do heroine and stop faking sexual relationships. Sex just for pleasure is as pointless as drug use and is life wasted. In true sexual relationships in most cases once children are born all the love and hormones transfer to care for them. After all we are actually related to our children not our partner, the only thing that binds us to the partner is love and marriage. Its interesting that gay marriage tries to copy heterosexual marriage by adopting children, but gays know that in its essence their relationship is not about producing children. Surely if sodomy was all that mattered then why are gays not happy with that? So they prove that productive sex is the point, and yet they do not take part in productive sex. The chimerical nature of what they are trying to do should be obvious. My persona belief is that if homosexuality is to be accepted by society then gays need to develop a framework for it. Heterosexual have been very creative inventing love and marriage. Homosexual need to invent their own institutions. I mean in Homosexuality why are you limited to just 2 in a partnership? In Heterosexuals that is what you need for a child, but in homosexuals you can have as many as you like. And why are heterosexual a union of male and female? Again that is what you need for a child. Homosexual could be anything. Do some plastic surgery invent new organs and ways to do "sodomy" it is unlimited. A friend used to joke about drilling new holes. Why not? So its not really moral, that is too simplistic. There is just a lot of confusion. Worth noting that interpretations of the past are uncertain and hard to make. We pick and chose. Human sacrifice was practiced by some societies as was sodomy. Why use Past to justify one and not the other? Ancient Greece is often quoted regarding homosexuality, but think the male paedophilia of the aristocracy was considered perverted by the rest of society who didn't write much. Such analysis is complex.

===

Was looking up the Karma Sutra. Apparently it does mention sodomy and homosexuality, but that is it. It is certainly not a focus of attention and not considered important to a good life. I did skim read it years ago but perhaps time for another look...