So Google gives this definition of "terrorism":
Now since 1945, in order to avoid a recurrence of the wars that plagued Europe and America, "authorisation" has been granted by the UN.
That means anyone using violence without a UN Resolution is a terrorist.
So therefore America, Russia, Israel, Britain, Saudi-Arabia, Palestine, Yemen, ISIS, Al-Qaida etc and scores of people in Africa are all terrorists! And if you supply weapons in any unauthorised violence you are supporting terrorism and therefore a terrorist too.
So in fact the entire West is a Terrorist! The War on Terror then has been a complete failure as unauthorised violence has only spread since 2000.
Of the major land masses the only ones not terrorists at the moment are China and India.
This puts UK in a difficult position. It is opposed to Terrorism, does not cooperate with Terrorists nor even negotiate with terrorists and yet its main ally America is a terrorist. By contrast the majority of the Commonwealth is not terrorist.
So UK's only correct option here is to break all agreements with America and its allies, and stop co-operation with the West.
For many countries this would be problematic but as Brexit has shown Britain is resilient and with the remnants of its Empire in the form of the Commonwealth has very strong trading partners already in place. Combining forces with the UN, Britain could move to the right side of History and uphold the developments that came after WW2 looking forward to a positive world that opposes terrorism, fear, oppression and unilateral undemocratic action by states.
No comments:
Post a Comment