So a big problem. In a world where a "loser" is simply an individual living on the "margins" what place is there for compassion and mercy?
In any population there will be so much resources to go around. Some will be fortunate, or strong, or both and some will be less. Those that fail to provide for themselves will die and above that cut off there will be poverty. Variance in the supply of resources will create a larger marginal zone as monopoly individuals become stressed and marginal individuals get a break.
This is a simple game.
So what attitude to marginal individuals? If we help them then we are spreading stress into the system for other individuals! A problem.
A search for happiness in poverty. Happiness with personal loss, and a challenge to the wisdom of economic growth and environmental exploitation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"The Jewish Fallacy" OR "The Inauthenticity of the West"
I initially thought to start up a discussion to formalise what I was going to name the "Jewish Fallacy" and I'm sure there is ...
-
The classic antimony is between : (1) action that is chosen freely and (2) action that comes about through physical causation. To date no ...
-
Well that was quite interesting ChatGPT can't really "think" of anything to detract from the argument that Jews have no clai...
-
There are few people in England I meet these days who do not think we are being ruled by an non-democratic elite. The question is just who t...
No comments:
Post a Comment