Nature abhors a vacuum. Apparently in a space with all particles removed there would still be spacetime. Yet I am dubious. Logically if there are no particles how can there be distance and time? Or in other words how can there be the "potential" for movement without there being anything to move? It seems to me that spacetime would be created around every particle rather than have some independent existence? There ends my naive and limited foray into physics...
except for this. What happens if a ball of ions is spun very fast and some charge imbalance occurs at random? This creates an imbalance in the magnetic field which might reinforce the charge imbalance to create a big potential difference... as long as it is spinning. When it slows down then the potential difference is released and kaboom.
So a vortex is created in the air alongside a lightening bolt. Ionised air is trapped in the vortex and hey preso. Such an unusally charged object may indeed behave statically like the ball lightening observed.
Maths aint good enough to explore this... maybe have a go one day
A search for happiness in poverty. Happiness with personal loss, and a challenge to the wisdom of economic growth and environmental exploitation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"The Jewish Fallacy" OR "The Inauthenticity of the West"
I initially thought to start up a discussion to formalise what I was going to name the "Jewish Fallacy" and I'm sure there is ...
-
The classic antimony is between : (1) action that is chosen freely and (2) action that comes about through physical causation. To date no ...
-
Well that was quite interesting ChatGPT can't really "think" of anything to detract from the argument that Jews have no clai...
-
There are few people in England I meet these days who do not think we are being ruled by an non-democratic elite. The question is just who t...
No comments:
Post a Comment