Tarski indefinability theorem is very close to the SRH: the idea that metalanguages must be kept separate from languages else contradictions arise precisely when they self-reference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarski%27s_undefinability_theorem
And it is all to do with the power of the "not" function.
I need to know in what way metalanguages are "bigger'. This is what the +1 theorem would be, and also the sense of how the Horatio Principle or God is bigger also. All these various ideas finding meaning at last due to the great work of these men...
and I need to grasp this bit on diagonalisation full too...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagonal_lemma
otherwise I think I'm finally in the driving seat to deal with the SRH :-)
A search for happiness in poverty. Happiness with personal loss, and a challenge to the wisdom of economic growth and environmental exploitation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"The Jewish Fallacy" OR "The Inauthenticity of the West"
I initially thought to start up a discussion to formalise what I was going to name the "Jewish Fallacy" and I'm sure there is ...
-
The classic antimony is between : (1) action that is chosen freely and (2) action that comes about through physical causation. To date no ...
-
Well that was quite interesting ChatGPT can't really "think" of anything to detract from the argument that Jews have no clai...
-
There are few people in England I meet these days who do not think we are being ruled by an non-democratic elite. The question is just who t...
No comments:
Post a Comment