Sunday, 2 October 2011

To be constrained, and the constraint.

For a system to be useful it must have constraints. For example a system of N degrees of freedom can be represented in an N dimensional space, however without constraints it occupies that whole space.

The problem is the opposite for a system that is seeking to express itself. It needs freedom from constraints so that it may be large enough to contain all possibilities. The N dimensional space is the ideal system in which to express other systems because it is free from all constraints other than its dimensionality.

For a system to express itself it needs to have less constraints than itself. If it has the same constraints as itself then isn’t its representation the same as itself?

No comments:

US displaying its Imperialist credentials... yet again

Wanted to know the pattern of UN votes over Venezuela and then got into seeing if ChatGPT could see the obvious pattern of Imperialism here....