https://theconversation.com/the-multiverse-our-universe-is-suspiciously-unlikely-to-exist-unless-it-is-one-of-many-200585
So Universe is "exactly" right for life. And the obvious answer is it was "made" like that.
But another answer is there were trillions of trials and this is the one that "worked."
BUT and this goes again to core of Buddhism (and I keep going back to Buddhism cos that is the one thing that is correct) to say it "worked" means it gave rise to "us".
Those universes without intelligent life have no one sitting there asking questions. But "who" are these people who need to sit there to qualify the universe as having "worked?" What does it take to "work?" And this is the individual/collective issue.
Does it take "me" in other words? Unless I was born has the universe "worked" or can I delegate that to you?
In which case how far does this delegation go? Are their aliens in another universe thinking how odd that their universe "works."
Buddhism (and Hinduism) do answer this exactly because there is no individual in the first place (there is just One Being with many "individual" faces in Hinduism). And actually all the universes are connected by this One Being, and multiverse is an illusion. Anyway.
In Buddhism its similar but the emphasis is on the One Being being the same as the many faces. Very fine focus on there being no separate entity. The theology of Hinduism does suggest to some that there are separate Gods on Mount Kailash.
No comments:
Post a Comment