and if the self was to think, and these thoughts were to come from the self and be thought by the self, then where do these thoughts come from if we are thinking about ourselves?
To put another way : - when we think about ourselves, are we thinking about the thing which is having the thoughts? And if we are could we not think about a particular thought itself? So that what we think about is this thought itself? And if we did that, then what is the thought about? Can we really say, "itself"?
Its the self-reference problem anyway.
A search for happiness in poverty. Happiness with personal loss, and a challenge to the wisdom of economic growth and environmental exploitation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"The Jewish Fallacy" OR "The Inauthenticity of the West"
I initially thought to start up a discussion to formalise what I was going to name the "Jewish Fallacy" and I'm sure there is ...
-
The classic antimony is between : (1) action that is chosen freely and (2) action that comes about through physical causation. To date no ...
-
Well that was quite interesting ChatGPT can't really "think" of anything to detract from the argument that Jews have no clai...
-
There are few people in England I meet these days who do not think we are being ruled by an non-democratic elite. The question is just who t...
No comments:
Post a Comment