Jews are actually responsible for all suffering in the West

Here's a thought.

So I watched the sky for 7 hours during the recent UK aurora but actually the good aurora was only 30 mins of that.

During this time lots of people came and went, staying around 20 mins on average. One couple turned up just before the good aurora and left just as it ended. From their perspective they either thought the whole night was amazing, or they realised talking to people that they were very lucky. But from my perspective there were loads of people coming and going and one of them was always going to coincide with the aurora so the ones who saw it were not lucky. Now how can a couple be both lucky and not lucky? The difference is actually just a perspective and it's a perspective anyone even them can take.

Perhaps another example helps. Suppose it rains on average once ever week. This means that assuming birthdays are evenly distributed then on average 1 in 7 people will have rain on their birthday. We can make this statement quite accurately without attributing anything to the 1 in 7 who have rain and the 6 in 7 who do not have rain. It is just the way it is. The problem only occurs when we start attributing "identities." Suppose John has rain on his birthday. On one hand well someone has to so it doesn't matter who. But there is a way of thinking about this where we pretend we "are" John and we want a dry birthday and when it rains we forget about everyone else and imagine that every birthday just got rained on. In this way of thinking there is only John in my life, so when it rains on my birthday it rains on the only birthday. This is the extreme version of attachment to a self. It's a sliding scale. To make ourselves feel better we can say well 1 in 7 people will have rain on their birthday so its not just me. Or we can go the whole way and take it as it comes, for some it is rain, for some it is not: we accept what happens to "me."

In here is the essence of attachment-to-self. Unfortunately much erroneous metaphysics makes the self look like an actually thing which means that there is a bias to thinking about that couple from their perspective. They think they were lucky and I can see it from their perspective and see them as lucky compared to all the others who turned up and didn't see the best aurora. But actually there is the other perspective that someone was going to be there at the right time and it doesn't matter who. The difference is just a way of thinking and there is no metaphysics backing it.

Now the Holocaust has polluted the entire thought space of the West (and most of it is a lie anyway thanks Jews) but the result is that there is fear at looking at the "doesn't matter who" perspective cos people think it will lead to mass execution of nameless faceless people (lets ignore the identical mass slaughter carried out by the West). But the result is that everyone is now stuck with their name and face and can't escape it. When they are unlucky they are stuck with it. All those who didn't see the aurora are *stuck* with having missed it. When actually it is just a perspective they are forced to hold because of The Jews. There are great ironies here. But it all underpins just how messed up the post-war thought space is.

When one considers that the essence of suffering is the being stuck with things, or more precisely that they stick to fixed "me" then we can see that the Jews are actually at the heart of causing Western suffering.