Nesting genes are in women

This is not the best quote about the point but it will do today "81% of
women questioned said that they would 'consider buying a house in the
current environment' whereas a mere 30% of men would do the same". I noticed
a discussion board llast year in which the male writership were unanimous in
identifying their (non gay) partners as the driving force behind buying a
house against their reasoned thought that they were over priced. Long before
this I noticed the behaviour of my friends and their partners. I've set the
date at 25 years after which the "nesting gene" kicks in for the human
female (its part of the "baby gene" which they may not be directly aware of
at this stage). It involves finding a man with an income, and then some
property and then its DIY and renovations and just when you think its all
over, the baby. Nothing wrong with this gene, but its the unilateral and
apparently unconscious way that women operate which alarmed me. In a world
without women I think men would continue in quire relaxed bachelor type
lifestyles, quiet drinks in the pub on week days, trips away at the weekend
fishing or other sports. Buy the odd gadget or car, spend the weekend in the
garage with it, do reading the usual stuff. For women it seems totally
different - there is a powerful drive, against their control to procreate
and provide an enviornment for this. Its completely overwhelming for
females, something men will never experience I think. All nature had to do
for the male was to make them suckers for sex and provide a cocktail of love
drugs to get them attached to a girl and she would do the rest. Or so it
seems this way to this unmarried, unpartnered, heterosexual male. I've sort
of sensitively asked people how it all works, they say it is mutual but I
still get the sense its very much the woman thing still. So is the "nesting
gene" responsible for the subprime crisis?

In the last quote remember the Jewish story - it certainly makes the point
that because man ate the apple offered by the woman he is punished by a life
toiling in the fields... or so it might have felt for our ancestors as they
struggled to provide a living for his family.

Just an interpretation the above, but its an idea I've toyed with for a very
long idea.