Monday, 19 August 2024

The rising UK prison population

Obviously a complex subject, but lets take a macro look first:

Let us note that the US is #6 in the world for incarceration rate. You are more likely not to be free in the US than any country in Earth (except El Salvador, Cuba, Rwanda, Turkmenistan, American Samoa).

You are 4.5 times more likely to be put in prison by US than China, 1.6x Russia and 3.3x UK.

Now the US "we're tough on crime" argument doesn't extend this far they actually HAVE more crime.

So why does the US have so much more crime than the UK or any other country?

And as the UK adopts US policy is it any surprise we have rising crime?

Pure coincidence that the US government has totally failed its people creating a broken society that tops out globally on all measures of social disintegration from drug use, to violent and sexual crime, to theft... they have even stolen £1t from the UK recently with the CDO crisis in 2008.

SO the obvious move is to remove all West leaning UK governments with extreme prejudice, and to stop moving UK policy towards the US. In fact if UK governments are in any doubt about what policy to adopt the simple rule of thumb is to do the opposite of what Washington is doing.

Now the UK is under the Washington Dictatorship do we actually have the freedom to adopt our own policies. No we don't.

This leaves the UK with no option but to declare war on Washington in order to gain its freedom. And this is actually the situation that many other countries face like Iran, Russia, China, all of South America, Africa more or less, North Korea, Belarus, India in fact the majority of the world.

So when the US speaks of WW3 it is not wrong, however WW3 will be the world seeking freedom from Washington and not as Washington likes to fantasise further expansion of the power of Washington like we saw in WW2.

Now what does a post-Washington world look like? Obviously the collapse of a super power like Washington will create a power vacuum. But actually all the world was done at the end of WW2: we have the United Nations that upholds International Law and the brokering of disputes between nations. Only a crazy country like America would have moved to weaken and marginalise the UN.

But as argued throughout this blog the very move to destroy the Axis countries in WW2 was a portent to the view of Washington that the world should be rules by a single Dictatorship.

Well a Global Dictatorship might be acceptable if it was any good, but unfortunately of all countries it is America the very most ignorant and incapable country. They have no history beyond genocide and slavery and they have no insight into progress or the future. To compensate for this the US has tried to stop history and debate, and has pushed the Western world into a malaise of post-modernism where all voices have been dumbed down and all challenges to Washington power silenced. We exist in a very fragile peace created by a social anaesthetisation where Washington hopes the brainwash the world into a state where they do not question or even have the power to take control of their lives. Unfortunately it won't work. The very forces that drive Washington into the role of Dictator are the forces that will drive people away from that Dictatorship.

And yes prison populations may rise as people start to rebel against the nonsense and the anaesthetisation that Washington represents, but ultimately the very forces that drive all of this will break it. Empires rise and Empires fall and all those involved in these pointless activities will die.

No comments:

"The Jewish Fallacy" OR "The Inauthenticity of the West"

I initially thought to start up a discussion to formalise what I was going to name the "Jewish Fallacy" and I'm sure there is ...