Judaism is a Fraud

So I've argued before that Jacob is not the true inheritor of Abraham's blood line.

I've argued before that Jewish history is a myth, which doesn't even reflect the Bible which is also a myth. Especially that the Jews were never in captivity in Egypt (they were in captivity in Babylon) and Moses did not free them from slavery.

But here is the Theological issue. Now I'm no expert so this may not be correct, but it is simple and will take some squirming to avoid.

Yahweh means "I AM"

Now in Jewish theology the "I AM" is distinct from Man who was made by the "I AM." Man's forgetting of this and starting to confuse his own "i am" with that of God is SIN. When we start to live according to our own rules we drift from God.

Now this quite reasonable. But it is only half way. Let me say that again. The whole of Jewish theology is only half the picture.

The problem is that the universe if left in a dual state of Maker and Made, or Creation and created. If we are trying to avoid SIN this is a rather unstable state. You have "i am" running around seeing their "i am" up close and the great "I AM" is far away. they are going to follow "i am". Again reasonable. But is this really the end of the story?

The Hindus point out that the "I AM" and the "i am" are actually the same, but it is ignorance that leads to people seeing "I AM" as a multitude of little "i ams."

Now perhaps no Jew ever made it beyond the dual state. But the "i am" is not a fundamental part of the world. The "i am" in fact does not exist by itself. The dual state is actually counter productive. People living as "i am" may be God fearing for a bit, but it will never last because they do not deal with the fundamental ignorance which means they see the "i am" as separate from "I AM."

Now Jesus says "follow me" by which I assume he means give up your "i am" and put it in the service of the "I AM." This is really good.

But there is still one final stage seeing that the "i am" is not separate in the first place. Then there is no reconciliation or redemption needed as there is no one to receive it or even go astray. You need an "i am" before you can walk from God. Genesis says we learned to judge sin for ourself, which means we learned that we had just disobeyed God to gain that knowledge. But makes no mention of the "i am" upon which rebellion was founded. Perhaps it was the serpent who encouraged the "i am" but it seems Judaism never goes back to examine this moment, or consider that it can be undone.  

So Judaism does set up the problem correctly. It acknowledges that the small mortal self gets rather carried away with itself and thinks it can replace the single "I AM." And Judaism has the Original Sin where the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge gave the "i am" the belief in itself and it's ability to judge good and evil. But Judaism does not complete the circle and realise that the Original Sin is no permanent state of affairs. It is simply a misunderstanding that the "i am" can get over and let the "I AM" rule again.

Judaism does talk rather lamely about the possibility of reconciliation with God but this half of the story is seriously lacking, almost as if the creators of the religion gave up half way through. There is clearly an opportunity to examine the moment when the serpent encouraged Man to set himself before God, and clearly an opportunity to see Man is nothing without God, and the "i am" is just a lens through which we glimpse the "I AM." The "i am" is nothing in itself and then the mistake is gone. As simple as that.

But Judaism prefers to wallow in the mistake, own it, fabricate a whole mythology around the fallen state of Man and almost prefer this to just getting over it. But such egotistical behaviour is "i am" itself. Jews would rather be fallen "i ams" than get over it and realise the "I AM." A superstitious person might say perhaps this has a lot to do with what has happened to Jews ever since.