There is nothing special about the West, other than perhaps it is the least free and is the worst crime against Humanity yet.

Seeing the Al-Fayed scandal in the UK you think: Welcome to the free world.

In UK (and the West) the powerful have complete control of information to protect their crimes which go from personal abuses or power to national abuses of power like Iraq. Free? LOL. And the worst thing countries like Ukraine when they fall under the black cloud of the West become mired in the same control of information and protection of abuse. LOL to Ukrainians. Ignoring anything else Fayed bought Harrods in 1985 (go Capitalism) selling in 2010 so 25 years of abuse. Accusation arose 18months after his death (exactly the same as Savile). So in the crudest measure the probability of "the" accusation (in 1985) arising after his death is 1.5/39 = 3.8%. We with 5% confidence limit we reject the H0 that this is random. But there are 100s of accusations. So there is literally no way that he was not protected during h9is lifetime. Exactly like J. Savile. So what we want to know is who and why are these people protected? And just how corrupt is the West? We have a system that protects criminals from Savile to Iraq, from Credit Crunch to Grenfell Tower. Freedom? LOL. Freedom for who!? I suspect we can take all the nonsense the propaganda says about other countries as take that as an exact indication of the West. So we are undemocratic, controlled by a tight oligarchy at the top, totalitarian (seeking total control), hell bent on Global Conquest, and the people in the West are brainwashed, without choice and enslaved to the system. Yup ticks all the way. Next question what do we do? #Revolution is the only option left.