There is something about the West that is hard to pin down.
I don't know if it's general psychopathic psychology, a weakness of humans in general or whether its a particular toxicity that has led to the West prevailing. What people don't seem to appreciate through history is that "better the devil you know". As Syrians are finding out they were better under Assad and the West simply offers a mirage of promises that evaporate when it comes to delivery. Iraq literally next door could tell them this so why didn't the Syrians join Russia to fight the Western backed terrorists? Perhaps Russia is no better, but at least Assad was a devil they knew like Hussein who maintained peace and prosperity for all but the terrorists who wanted to overthrow the government and install their own extremist minority interpretation... every country has them. Israel the same, altho the West is backing the majority now after allowing mass migration of terrorist Zionists.
But the worst terrorists of all are the West themselves who think nothing of evaporating whole cities to impose their extremist views. Was the British Empire as bad as America here? London has its atrocities but can't think until Churchill we ever razed who cities to the ground to inflict Vlad the Impaler style terror. What is worse seeing your army impaled in a field of posts or turning up to find a whole city of innocent people that was there yesterday gone? With little question Churchill and Roosevelt deserve a place in Hell below even Vladimir.
So here's the thing the West has begun a program of terrorism to destroy Russian trade. We are back to the British sinking Spanish and Portuguese vessels and the C18th age of UK State sponsored piracy. Nothing ever changes. But are the Americans worse than the British? Has the West inadvertently unleashed the greatest devil yet in the form of an unrestrained America upon an unsuspecting world?
No comments:
Post a Comment