Sunday, 22 December 2024

So Starmer could introduce new law to block Musk from donating to Reform

But that's not the problem is it? It should be illegal to promote ideology or national affiliation in the media. To say for example that Assad is bad and not worthy of support and Bin Salman is a reformer worthy of support should be a crime. These are not facts but opinions and constitute brainwashing. That America is a worthy ally and Russia is not again should be illegal. Given that the media is nothing but propaganda seriously what difference does funding a party achieve? Starmer for instance is leader of the Labour Party whose role is to represent people not elites. But no amount of funding from the unions will change its fortunes: to get into power it needs the support of the elite and so he is just a safe spineless yes-man to the establishment under whose tenure we can be guaranteed nothing will change. #Reform jokes. They will just secure ever greater funding for the rich and the ever deeper extraction of wealthy from the poor by Capitalism. We can't all be Musk's and so already he reveals his belief in inequality and unequal social strata with a repressed enslaved majority.

No comments:

"The Jewish Fallacy" OR "The Inauthenticity of the West"

I initially thought to start up a discussion to formalise what I was going to name the "Jewish Fallacy" and I'm sure there is ...